By Shira | Jul 28, 10 01:29 PM
We've been working with Room 11 Productions, the team behind the documentary Lioness for a few years now, having designed their website, poster and DVDs. I recently interviewed Meg and Daria about the film's impact for MediaRights.org.
Check out the article:
LIONESS Outreach Journal: Engaging Americans Around the Changing Role of Women in Combat
By Ari | May 12, 10 08:09 PM
There's an upcoming Ithaca City School District election. The polls are open noon-9pm on May 18th. This is a very important election and we need the community to come out and vote for candidates who will help ensure equity remains a top priority for our district. Please spread the word and bring your friends to vote.
By Ari | Apr 22, 10 09:14 AM
I try to only post positive things but I had to make an exception this morning: Jon Voight on Obama via Huffington Post
The American People are witnessing the greatest lie that is cleverly orchestrated by President Obama and his whole administration. President Obama feeds people poison, giving them the idea that they are entitled to take from the wealthier who have lived and worked in a democracy that understands that capitalism is the only truth that keeps a nation healthy ... [Obama uses] a socialistic, Marxist teaching, and with it, he rapes this nation...
A dude can not use the word "rape" in this way and not be oppressive. Let's leave that word for real rape, okay? That quibble aside, I just want to make sure that everyone knows that it is not socialism but CAPITALISM that is sucking the blood out of the world's people like a giant parasite.
If capitalism is "the only truth that keeps a nation healthy" why are so many people suffering for want of money in this country? Because capitalism is a mechanism for moving money from workers into the pockets of rich people. Where do you think all the money goes? Why doesn't all of our hard work pay off? Because the owner of the coal mine, and the stockholders in the coal company, make astronomically more money than the miners - labor is being exploited. Voight reveals this in his quote - he's essentially saying, "protect me from mean Mr. Obama, I'm a rich person who's profited from the exploitation of workers and I want to keep profiting."
Capitalists want us to believe that capitalism is our friend, that it's how people get rich, and that getting rich is desirable. But it is a lie. Capitalism is doomed to failure. If you read Marx, you'll see why. Marx was not some devil out to destroy our righteous system, he was a humanitarian looking for ways to liberate the masses. WE ARE THE MASSES. Jon Voight is not the masses. Goldman Sachs is not the masses. WE THE PEOPLE ARE THE MASSES. We are the ones being exploited so that people like Jon Voight can jet all over the world spreading lies and misinformation to maintain their power.
This is our world, these are our lives. Capitalism was not made for us, it was made to exploit us. The sooner we can all see that its supporters have bamboozled us, the sooner we can reclaim our freedom and our planet from these thieves.
I am a pacifist and advocate non-violence. I believe the means are the ends in progress (thank you Gandhi). So I believe the solution here is to create positive, non-exploitative alternatives to capitalism. There are beautiful alternatives, and we have our whole future to find even better solutions than those we've already tried. I believe in human kind. I believe that if we put our heads together we can come up with something better than capitalism. Because no joke, capitalism is going to fail again and again - if it doesn't destroy our planet first.
By Ari | Jan 9, 10 07:44 AM
REAL communist revolutions must reject "efficiency" and nurture communalistic attempts to create a more humane society instead...Che tried to set a different standard for Cuba, and for humanity in general. As Minister of Finance, he managed to distribute the millions of dollars obtained from the USSR to artists, and to desperately poor farmers who in the U.S. would have been considered, shall we say, "poor risks."
By Ari | Nov 21, 09 08:11 AM
Please take action now to help stop natural gas drilling in New York State. We need support. Thank you!
By Ari | Oct 21, 09 11:11 AM
When I read Ian Perl's piece on on health insurance reform, I Am Not a Dog (Huffington Post) I kept thinking, if we treated animals with respect and compassion, calling a human an animal wouldn't be quite so dangerous.
Perl has muscular dystrophy and has been a target of discrimination:
Our lawsuit uncovered insurance company documents that confirmed my suspicion that I'm a target of discrimination. The documents revealed Guardian had compiled a "hit list" of its costliest members, including patients with muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, brain injury, and paralysis. Guardian executives referred to us all as "dogs" and "trainwrecks," and they debated how and when to dump us from the rolls. Laws prohibited the cancellation of the individual members with serious chronic health problems, so Guardian opted to cancel the plan for all members of this specific health plan in New York, an action that violates federal law.
Human beings have a history of using animal names and comparisons to justify the exploitation and oppression of other human beings. We can call a woman a "cow" to justify raping or abusing her. We can call people we want to exterminate "cockroaches," people we want to enslave "monkeys," and people we want to ignore "urchins." And we can call a man to whom we want to deny medical care a "dog." We can call humans all of these things, minimizing that which makes them worthy of our concern - their humanness - to justify treating them inhumanely. The animals who bare these names are, of course, even less worthy of our concern. Animals are not just denied medical treatment or abused, they're routinely forcibly inseminated by the billions so we can torture them for a short time before slaughtering them to fill our bellies.
In one of his novels, Isaac Bashevis Singer wrote, "As often as Herman had witnessed the slaughter of animals and fish, he always had the same thought: in their behaviour toward creatures, all men were Nazis. The smugness with which man could do with other species as he pleased exemplified the most extreme racist theories, the principle that might is right." Isaac saw that when we treat one sentient being as an object, we open the door to treating others in the same way. Leo Tolstoy too said: "As long as there are slaughterhouses... there will be battlefields." Will we one day realize, as a species, that our treating any feeling creature as if they can not feel pain (or as if their pain doesn't matter) is just not morally acceptable?
For some painful but illuminating perspective into the issue of treating people "like animals" and what that means about our treatment of animals themselves, please read:
By Ari | Sep 24, 09 09:20 AM
One of the most powerful visions I have experienced was the first photograph of the earth from outer space. The image of blue planet floating in deep space, glowing like the full mood on a clear night, brought home powerfully to me the recognition that we are indeed all members of a single family sharing one little home. I was flooded with the feeling of how ridiculous are the various disagreements and squabbles within the human family. I saw how futile it is to cling so tenaciously to the differences that divide us. From this perspective one feels the fragility, the vulnerability of our planet and its limited occupation of a small orbit sandwiched between Venus and Mars in the vast infinity of space. If we do not look after this home, what else are we charged to do on this earth?- Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama, in The Universe in a Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality
By Shira | Aug 25, 09 04:42 PM
I just heard about this documentary from TreeHugger.com. I guess drying your clothes outside is a revolutionary act. It's crazy that we have to fight for the right to not destroy the planet. Anyone want to join my campaign to legalize composting toilets?
Ari and I finally got clothes-pins and started line-drying...
By Ari | Aug 25, 09 03:57 PM
By Ari | Aug 5, 09 04:15 PM
We used Flickr and other social media including the Ning I set up for fD to record the happening, and to digest all we learned there so that it will be of use to a wider audience. Over time we'll be posting more and more videos and texts, but even now, you can see photos, videos, info on the amazing people who were there, and other coverage online. Check it out and join the Ning if you too care about free expression and the power of culture to change the world!
By Shira | Aug 4, 09 09:39 AM
Working with footage from freeDimensional's 2009 Wasan retreat, I put together this 8-minute video, which has been submitted to the Commonwealth Foundation's Group on Culture and Development:
Hosting Activism in Art Spaces from freeDimensional on Vimeo.
By Shira | Jul 14, 09 07:31 PM
We're going to see Bruno tonight!!!
By Shira | Jul 11, 09 12:55 PM
Ari and I went to Wasan Island in the Muskoka Lake region of Canada to help facilitate and document a retreat for people working in emerging art spaces around the world. Organized by the nonprofit network freeDimensional and supported by Breuninger Stiftung Foundation, the week-long convergence provided an opportunity to connect, relax and delve into the interconnections between art, freedom of expression and human rights.
Despite my role as documenter - I was taking photos and shooting video for a large part of the time - I was still able to connect deeply with the group and with the island. It's a beautiful place that allows people from very different geographies to find common ground.
Check out the photos and stay tuned for video...
By Ari | Jul 10, 09 07:59 AM
Shira and I just got back from a two week trip. First there was a week on Wasan Island with our friends from freeDimensional. fD was holding their annual retreat. Last year Shira and I went along as participants, and this year, we were involved as paid staff. We facilitated some sessions, offered one-on-one consultations, and are continuing to document the whole thing with photos, video, and Twitter and blogging. You can read my blog here, and my fD Tweets here. It was a beautiful experience, of course - I think being on Wasan is very, very special, and essential to fD's development. As we continue our follow-up coverage I'm sure the dreamy awesomeness will coalesce into something more coherent than I'm managing here, now.
After our week in Canada, we got on a plane to Tel Aviv - we were headed to Haifa, Israel, to attend Shira's grandmother's 80th birthday. On the plane, I felt so terrible I was worried there was something wrong with me. When we visited Albany a few weeks ago, I was bitten by a tick, but it wasn't until we were in Haifa that the symptoms of Lyme Disease showed themselves. I spent a couple of days with a fever over 100°F, (37.8°C) and then antibiotics saved me. Yay medical technology. And yay having doctors in the family! They don't even have Lyme Disease in Israel, so the hospital would have cost a lot for nothing. Instead, Shira's dad backed up my internet-aided diagnosis and helped me get medication. Did you know that many people who get Lyme Disease get a red target-shaped rash around the bite? It seriously looks like a target. It is very, very weird, but a very helpful signal, as if the tick is leaving you a note saying "this right here is why you feel like your whole body is broken." Thanks, tick.
So, I missed Margalit's birthday, but I hear it was awesome, involving a custom-designed and drawn Pictionary-style guessing game invented by our nephew Eli, and a tour of a botanical garden, and dancing. Shira's posting photos and videos on Flickr, so keep an eye on her photostream if you want to see the cuteness. The parts I was conscious for included a drive to Tel Aviv, where we had dinner at a restaurant on the beach, and then went to a modern dance performance that we all enjoyed. Shira and her brother Amit have been working on a film project with Margalit, and Shira took some footage of her one night, also on a beach.
Israel continues to mystify me. I see it usually as an outsider, and am aghast at the politics, the religious struggle, the violence. Going in and out of the country, the security checks frighten me, and when I'm there, the ever-present soldiers and machine guns scare me as well. But in Israel, there is a curious peace. Most of the time, it's just people living their lives. One can forget that the stakes are so high, that there are blind spots. Shira and I walked on a boardwalk and she climbed down some rocks to the beach, while I waited up top. I watched a woman walking her dog, not letting him stop to sniff and greet other dogs. A man rode by on his bike playing Arabic music on a boom box, and a group of kids shouted happily at him and danced as he passed. The lights of the city glittered along the shore. Peace, at that moment, in that place. We were all coexisting, enjoying the warm summer air and the sound of the sea.
Anyway, here we are back in Ithaca. I'm glad to be back. Sid and Zora and Snow got visits from Isaac, Marina, and Jeremy and Teresa while we were away, and when we came back we found them happy and chill, and our apartment clean and cozy. We're so blessed, with these friends, this community. Today we have another long day of catching up on client work and activist projects; I have a couple of phone meetings and some deadlines and am wondering how I'm going to get it all done. Right now, I'm enjoying a cup of coffee on the sofa with Snow. It's good to be back.
By Shira | Jun 11, 09 02:44 PM
I had a chance to see a preview copy of the new documentary Food, Inc. and interview the Director, Robert Kenner. This is my first article for the International Documentary Association's blog, and I'm psyched to get a chance to write about a topic so close to my heart:
Here's an excerpt and you can read the full article online:
Change: It's What's for Dinner: 'Food, Inc.' Takes on Agribusiness
In a world dominated by corporations, it is no surprise that the American food system has been hijacked by the relentless drive for profit. Under the pretexts of affordability and convenience, modern industrialized agriculture has consistently ignored the unintended consequences of their "efficient" practices on our health and livelihoods, the environment and other species.Equally implicated is the United States government, which simultaneously subsidizes and fails to adequately regulate the agriculture industrial complex. This reality, explored by Frederick Wiseman in his 1976 cinema vérité documentary Meat and more recently by Nikolaus Geyrhalter in the unnarrated montage film Unser täglich Brot (Our Daily Bread; 2005), is more explicitly tackled in Robert Kenner's Food, Inc., which opens June 12 in New York City, Los Angeles and San Francisco, and nationwide on June 19.
The issue of food and the many ways in which it affects our lives is an enormous one, and the film is a broad undertaking, exploring everything from the health impacts of ever ubiquitous high-fructose corn syrup (one out of three Americans born today is expected to develop early-onset diabetes), to water and air pollution caused by intensive factory farming, to human rights violations perpetrated against undocumented workers by mega corporations like Smithfield Foods, the world's largest pork producer. Viewers are aided in processing all of this information by motion graphics created by Big Star NYC, which worked with Kenner to create an entertaining and helpful visual language for the film.
Ultimately, Food, Inc. is an examination of free market capitalism's disregard for anything other than the bottom line. "This is a film that's about more than food," says Kenner. "It's really about corporate consolidation and irresponsibility and about the relationship of these companies with government. It's not that different from what happened with the financial crisis. These companies have been totally irresponsible and at the end of the day, we're the ones who pay the price."
By Ari | Apr 23, 09 05:55 PM
By Ari | Apr 19, 09 10:51 AM
I was just reading this article about tweens in love with the Obama girls, and I was glad to read that the Obamas are really trying to minimize media contact and coverage of their daughters - despite the awesome cuteness of so many kids obsessing over them like they're pop stars. I think people being in love with the Obamas is 100% great. I mean, yes, we should be critical and we should demand good policy and decision-making from Obama, but if tons of people love the First Family and want to be friends with them, I think that bodes well for our country. It sure is nicer than the atmosphere during the Bush presidency. Those were an uncomfortable eight years. I'd rather feel love than contempt for my elected leadership, personally.
However, love that finds its end in consumerism (the article suggests that concert tickets or DVDs are usually the outlet for kids' celebrity obsessions) or in oppression (the media spotlight and the paparazzi can be incredibly unhealthy) is not just love, it's become something else. I dream of a day when humans can love ourselves and other humans for who we all really are, without regard for artificial hierarchies and power structures. We put some people up on pedestals and obsess about them, lionize them or demonize them, over-analyze every gesture and purchase they make. Even if we love them dearly, we may be setting ourselves up for sorrow or for disappointment, depending on how their media image and their life (separate things!) pan out. Or we may subject them to such scrutiny they self-destruct (sorry Britney). This is why I don't believe in heroes.
By Ari | Apr 15, 09 08:40 AM
So, I kind of can't believe this, but I agree with an article in the New York Daily News. And it's called In Vermont gay marriage law, a hidden victory for religious freedom. At first I saw that headline and thought, oh damn, there's some loophole that will make it legal for the Pope to eat gay newlyweds. Or something else similarly creepy and oppressive. But it's actually really sensible: Author David Benkof is happy that the new legislation in Vermont specifically provides an out to any religious groups that have issues with same-sex marriage: They don't have to provide gay couples who are getting married with goods and services.
I'm totally okay with that. This is not a pharmacist denying the morning-after pill to an unintentionally pregnant teen. This is not life-threatening, and it's not violating some "first do no harm" mandate. This is just reason to choose a different florist, one who doesn't believe you're going to hell.
Why force people to do things they feel are wrong? I care deeply about peace, justice and sustainability - so I don't take design work that promotes zoos, "happy meat," sweatshop labor, and other things I find objectionable. People make decisions like this all the time, don't they? So why, as the author of this article points out, was eHarmony forced to create a queer dating site, if they found queerness so odious that they wouldn't allow same-sex searches on their primary, heteronormative dating site? And why would any gay folks actually use the new site by eHarmony? Why not go to any one of the many, many sites out there run by and for queer people who love queer people? If we force everyone to provide services to everyone, aren't we losing the usefulness of the niche audience - the self-selecting community? Personally, I like patronizing those I can stand behind ethically. And not everyone has my ethics.
When Shira and I got hitched, we paid our favorite vegan restaurant to cater it. We rented space from a progressive, arty Brooklyn hangout. We're not into organized, hierarchical religion, so instead of hiring an officiant to approve of our union, we asked everyone in the room to marry us with a toast to fun and love. And so on. In short, we made it our own. We made it something we could believe in, something we loved.
I just can't imagine how much it would have sucked if we'd hired people who think our love is an abomination - and how much worse it would have been to then pay lawyers to sue them, if they didn't do what we wanted. Aren't weddings supposed to be about love? I think Vermont has figured this one out, and I bet their efforts will make this legislation very hard to challenge: Everyone wins.
By Ari | Apr 4, 09 10:40 AM
Read this excerpt from Jobless rate bolts to 8.5 percent, 663K jobs lost (AP):
Orders placed with U.S. factories actually rose in February, ending a six straight months of declines, the government reported Thursday. Earlier in the week, there was better-than-expected reports on construction spending and pending home sales. And last week a report showed that consumer spending — an engine of the economy — rose in February for the second month in a row — after a half-year of declines.
All of these things involve people spending money. That is, the indicator of a healthy economy does not appear to be, "are people's needs being met?" but "are people spending enough?" But then, who knows, maybe spending a lot of money is somehow meeting people's needs. Is that so?
Continue reading "Health and wealth: The downfall of capitalism and the uplift of humanity..." »
By Ari | Apr 2, 09 09:02 AM
![]()
Yaaaay, we're not the only ones wondering how making bankers and other capitalists richer is going to help everyone else. Check out this amazing slideshow showing London protesters clashing with police at the G20 summit, courtesy of ABC News.
While I wish that all of the protesters had remained nonviolent, it seems most of them did. What a turn-out. Seeing the huge crowd gives me hope that a world made for people and not for profit is just around the corner.
(Top photo by PA/AP, bottom photo by Andrew Winning/Reuters. Please don't sue me for using these without permission.)
By shirari | Feb 4, 09 02:33 PM

Tune into the Wednesday, February 4th edition of our podcast to check out our snappy new format! We've broken the show into three segments to make it easier for folks to selectively listen to parts they're interested in:
Links mentioned in the show:
Hook up with other Fingerlakes Permaculture folks at flxpermaculture.net
Ithaca Freeskool
Ithaca Zine
Ahimsa Ecovillage
Ithaca Vegans Yahoo Group
Vegan Chai is so over bacon!
Ari's Twitter
Find a local CSA at localharvest.org
If you listen to our podcast, tell us what you like about it, and what could be improved! And if you don't listen to our podcast, why not? Tell us what you might like to hear, so we can do a better job of it. Thanks and peace to all who tune into this edition!
Previously:
Previous show notes
By Ari | Feb 2, 09 05:54 PM
I really dug this piece about Iceland's PM marks gay milestone, about Johanna Sigurdardottir, Iceland's new prime minister, who's an out lesbian. The quotes from folks in government offices point to how forward-thinking Iceland is around sexuality.
Matthew Parris, who served as a Conservative Member of Parliament in Britain from 1979 until 1986, says politicians are often more worried than they should be about making their sexual orientation public. "Speaking from my own experience, I was sort of in the closet when I was an MP, and I always imagined that the world would fall in if people found out," he says. "Well, when I finally did come clean, it turned out most of my constituents had guessed already and didn't give a damn!"He believes gay politicians are often still frightened to come out. "They tend to hear the reactionary minority that speaks out against homosexuality, not the majority who quietly approve. "If they came out, they'd be pleasantly surprised by the public reaction!"
By Shira | Jan 20, 09 02:00 PM
My brother Amit left an inspiring poem as a comment on our blog:
On Martin Luther King Day
On the eve of THE Inauguration
I ask
What if
What if
Martin had not been shot
Ghandi
John
John
Yitzchak
What if
Children
Millions of Children were not murdered
The Indigo Girls said it better than I
"These are the questions
Stacked like wood
These are the answers
Here is potential gone for good"
I read that an 80-year old grand-child of slaves will see a Free man become our president.
What if
Wise Grand-parents and
Wise Grand-children
Made
Peace
Now
?
Thanks Amit!
The last few days have been very emotional to say the least. The main commercial artery of Ithaca, State Street, has been dually designated as Martin Luther King, Jr. Street.
And now, we can finally say that Barack Hussein Obama is the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!
There's no way that one man can live up to all of our expectations, but for me, the most important thing is that Obama's election has restored my belief that this country can move forward and be a positive force in the world again. Thank you to everyone who voted and worked to get Obama elected!
By Shira | Jan 15, 09 01:34 PM
A good friend of mind asked me to explain the current crisis in Israel/Palestine. Here are my (unedited) ramblings...
i think a lot of people are confused and torn about this issue, including me. the situation in israel/palestine is a cycle of violence in which the game of "who started it" is meaningless and counterproductive. the basic facts are that jews and muslims (and christians, and druze...) all have historical and religious ties to the land. the problem is that extremists within these populations believe that these rights are exclusive to their people and that they therefore have the right to kill anyone who threatens those rights.
enter modern warfare and politics. after the holocaust, the united nations, which should have stopped violence against european jews before world war II and earlier, was convinced that the jews deserved a homeland of their own. the british had control over palestine at the time, but it was mostly populated by arabs. there were also jews living there, including my father's mother's family, who have lived in jerusalem for generations. the proposition at the time was to create two states - one arab and one jewish, each autonomous. the arab population didn't want to give up what they felt was rightfully theirs. the jewish immigrants and the jews that had been coming to settle the land and established kibbutzim (agricultural communes) starting in the late 1800s were willing to fight. hence the "war of independence" as the israelis call it.
from the establishment of the state of israel in 1948, this cycle of violence has continued. (my mother was born there in 1949 after my grandparents survived the holocaust and met in cyprus, where they were imprisoned until the british let them in to the country). israel, surrounded by arab countries was attacked over and over again. these same countries did little to help the palestinian refugees that lived in camps in their borders. after the 1967 war, israel gained control over the west bank and the gaza strip, and continue to have complete control over the flow of people and resources in and out of these areas. at the same time the israeli government has actively encouraged jewish settlements within these regions. for the most part, jews who choose to live in the settlements are the most orthodox and extreme and see themselves as being on the frontlines. by the way, a lot of them are also american jews.
there are arabs who live in israel who don't identify as palestinians. they are second class citizens in many ways - their communities are generally underfunded and they rarely have high positions in the corporate sectors, but they are allowed to vote and have political parties. many of their palestinian brothers and sisters are economically dependent on israel for jobs, so they come into israel every day, crossing through checkpoints, with notoriously long lines and humiliating searches.
most palestinians feel that they are occupied and want freedom. they want their own country, and they are willing to fight for it using any means necessary. since there is no palestinian military, they use small cells and guerrilla tactics, and are embedded within the civilian population. they send rockets and suicide bombers into israel, targeting civilians. the israeli military fights back with many more resources, thanks largely to the alliance with america. hamas, both a political party and a militant movement, in turn is supplied with weapons by iran, which hates both the u.s. and israel.
it is my belief that when violence is involved, neither side is right. israel has made some very meaningful attempts to create peace and even move towards a two-state solution, but extremist palestinians continue to use violence to call attention to their suffering. in the meantime, most israelis are living in a modern democratic state with all the amenities of western culture, while palestinians are living in much poorer conditions in the west bank and gaza. it's hard to tell an occupied population not to fight for their freedom, but israelis, at the same time, feel like they are defending their own freedom.
there are amazing people on both sides working for peace. many of them are secular, but some are religious. personally, i think that nation states are inherently violent entities, and unless one side or the other is willing to give up, this conflict will continue for a very long time. as a jew, i feel a tie to the land of israel and its people and i do think that jewish people should be able to live there. but i don't think that we are any more entitled to a jewish state than the palestinians are entitled to return to their homes and sacred places. i think the best solution would be one, secular, nonviolent, democratic (or perhaps even socialist) state. will it happen? not anytime soon.
there is so much more to say, i could go on and on. my cousin amir just entered the israeli army, and i worry about him everyday. most of my family lives in northern israel so they are not in immediate danger, but there are of course, random suicide bombings that kill jews in haifa and jerusalem and elsewhere. one of my cousin tal's close friends was killed in a bus bombing in haifa, and she was scared to leave the house for months. if i were them, i wouldn't live in israel, and i think that maybe when they get older, they will leave. on the other hand, israel is the only home they've ever known and it's where their parents, grandparents and friends all live. maybe by the time they have kids, there will be some meaningful peace. we can hope.
there are some really good documentaries on the issue. i recommend promises and encounter point, both available on netflix. there's also a really good film about palestinian hip hop called slingshot hip hop. you should also check out the music of invincible a.k.a ilana weaver, a queer rapper from detroit who raps about social justice issues and does a lot of work with palestinians. her song "people not places" is amazing. you should also listen to mirah's song "jerusalem." for alternative news coverage of the current crisis, check out link tv and al jazeera.
i hope this is helpful. feel free to ask more questions. knowledge is power.
By Ari | Jan 14, 09 12:06 PM
I've had two more book reviews published by Feminist Review. Both of these were awesome books. Ain't I a Feminist in particular really expanded my horizons and pushed me to think about privilege and identity in new ways.
Argentina: Stories for a Nation
Ain't I a Feminist? African American Men Speak Out on Fatherhood, Friendship, Forgiveness, and Freedom
Yay Feminist Review! Contact them if you're interested in writing reviews - you get to keep the book (or movie or album) in exchange for your review.
By Shira | Dec 16, 08 05:51 PM

December 16, 2008 - 71 minutes - 95.5MB
After an update about Ithaca, Shaleshock and our vegan ecovillage project, we discuss our top eight best practices for changing the world and conclude the show with some ideas for a d.i.y. anticapitalist holiday season.
Show links:
Some Places Worth Donating To (there are so many more, here are just a few):
Previously:
By Ari | Dec 13, 08 03:58 PM
Just Seeds has a new sale page and it's awesome. If you're looking for something to give someone for the holidays, they've got some great prints up there, and they're really affordable.
By Ari | Dec 12, 08 09:43 PM
A while ago I wrote about a collaborative notebook project, Do Not Leave Unattended! We were lucky enough to get one of Jude's first notebooks; I passed it onto Shira, and then she passed it onto Angela. She wrote about it and you can see it at Do Not Leave Unattended! It is pretty awesome. I found it really moving.
Previously:
Do Not Leave Unattended: Dispatches from Ithaca
Do Not Leave Unattended!: New design launched
By Ari | Dec 11, 08 01:05 PM
It looks like Socialist Party USA is going to publish some of my more activisty artwork in the upcoming International Women's Day edition of Socialist Women. I've done some custom illustration for them and even laid out the whole magazine several times, but this is the first time they'll be publishing the art I make for my own activist purposes. Since it's heavy on animal rights and sustainability and the issue (like most issues...) didn't have any content along those lines, the editorial collective asked me to write an artist's statement to go with the work. I sometimes have a hard time asserting myself as an earthy-crunchy animal-loving hippie in the socialist community, and people have a tendency to get pissed when one draws connections between the oppression of humans and animals, so writing this was a challenge! I really welcome comments from folks - let me know what you think.
In progressive activist circles we often talk of solidarity, and with good reason - unexamined privilege and blindness to the oppression of others makes social change difficult. If we come to activism with open minds and open hearts, we'll find allies everywhere, and our unity will advance the causes of peace and social justice. Fortunately, over time, the circle of compassion has widened further and further. People really seem to be learning to look beyond our differences and understand and identify with each other's struggles on an international level. And finally, activists working in all areas are realizing that this compassion needs to be extended not only to all humans but to the home we all share, our earth.However, many people are still reluctant to open the circle of compassion to non-human animals. Even in the most radical queer or feminist or socialist spaces, mentions of animal rights are often met with ridicule or patronizing requests that we stick to "real issues" like human rights. Though animals feel pain and pleasure, are sentient enough to have families and desires and agendas of their own, and there are vegan alternatives aplenty to their exploitation, animal rights, we are told, will have to wait until after the revolution.
This pattern is an old one, repeated time after time throughout history. Sojourner Truth was told that black women's rights had to wait until after white women's suffrage had been secured. Bayard Rustin was denied credit for organizing the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom because he was queer. Every time we disregard one person's rights to advance someone else's rights, we may think we're being strategic, but we're also oppressing someone and holding back their struggle.
The means are the ends. We need to be the change we wish to see. It's time for a radical new solidarity that acknowledges all oppressions and all struggles as interconnected. Believe it or not, there are no limits to compassion. Perfection might not be attainable, but it is entirely possible for each of us to begin to abstain not only from the oppression of other humans, but from exploiting animals as well.
Animals may not be able to communicate in a language we can understand, but they have many allies in their struggle: vegans, finally coming to accept and move beyond our species privilege. We may be part of the "circle of life" but our species is capable of great things, including forging new paths that don't include the strong preying on the weak.
I'm an activist / artist living in a progressive town where my partner and I are organizing a back-to-the-land vegan housing collective. I work with local groups and folks online to do community organizing and create art and outreach materials around issues of sustainability, radical solidarity, nonviolence, and economic justice. You can see my work, find out about my current projects, and check out our blog and podcast at shirari.com.
By Ari | Dec 7, 08 08:56 AM
I've been catching up on my reading, and have encountered two incidences of happy nudity that I just had to share.
In Carbusters #36, at the end of a report on the World Carfree Day events in Curitiba, Brazil: "Finally we began our bike march: 300 cyclists swept the streets of the city. The feeling of freedom and happiness was so intense that a few riders couldn't resist, and took off their clothes."
And, in Communities Magazine #138, in Anissa Ljanta's story of the shock of moving from an intentional community to a mainstream neighborhood: "I missed being naked, and the ease with which people were naked at Twin Oaks. People made an effort to appreciate beauty of all kinds, not just the skinny hairless women validated by mainstream media. I got to live in a culture that embraced me for who I was, where body image and dress were not fraught with tension."
Ljanta's story is sadder - she goes on to express her resentment at being asked to wear clothes while swimming; she describes her run-ins with sexism and the very real possibility of sexual violence which requires women in mainstream neighborhoods to be careful when walking alone at night, something she didn't fear at Twin Oaks. However, both of these stories offer glimpses of a kind of happy nudity that sounds like something that should happen more often.
Seriously, how often do you feel happy and free enough that you can revel in the body nature gave you? If we're all born with a naked body to enjoy, and we like looking at naked bodies, and all other species are running around naked all the time, what exactly is up with us that we have so many hangups about nudity? Wouldn't it be nice if we lived in a world where nudity was not only safe and socially acceptable, but viewed as a healthy expression of joy?
By Shira | Dec 6, 08 03:05 AM
There are many factors that contribute to the fertility and productivity of land that are beyond a landowners' direct control. One of the major issues we need to consider in New York State is natural gas drilling. Ever since the development of more commercially-viable drilling techniques around 2000, major oil companies have been going to town on the Marcellus Shale. One of the main ways they get access to the land is by leasing land and drilling rights from local landowners. While this can be a good source of income for struggling farmers, there are numerous environmental impacts including the distribution of toxic chemicals into the soil and water table.
We've been getting involved with Shaleshock, a local resistance group, and we recently designed their logo and a new website. Check out the site to get up to speed on the issues and take action. One thing you can do now is comment on the DEC's draft scope...
The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has released a draft scope document that outlines how they will regulate natural gas drilling of the Marcellus Shale. In addition to commenting at public hearings around the state, you can submit your comments via letter or email by December 15th.
Submit comments to:
Attn: Scope Comments
Bureau of Oil & Gas Regulation, NYSDEC Division of Mineral Resources
625 Broadway, Third Floor
Albany, NY 12233-6500
Or email to dmnog@gw.dec.state.ny.us with "Scope Comments" as the Subject
By Shira | Dec 3, 08 01:21 PM
By Ari | Nov 15, 08 09:20 AM
The TIME article What Happens If You're on the Gay "Enemies List" reports that some queer folks have responded to people of color and Mormons who voted down marriage equality in California with some bigotry of their own. I don't know how wide-spread or real these acts of racism and religious intolerance are. I wish we queer folk could all commit to taking the higher ground and using only peaceful, respectful means to get equal rights. But it's not a perfect world, our country obviously has issues around identity politics, and some queer people are bigots, too. I'm not excusing these folks' behavior whatsoever, just pointing out that they're the exception, not the rule, when it comes to activism for queer equality.
This article also calls out queer folks for organizing efforts like Anti-Gay Blacklist, wherein the details of individual donors to the Yes on 8 campaign are posted on the internet so those who support marriage equality can boycott them and send mail to the companies they work for. Let's think about a few other times in which such lists of people have been used, which might point to whether this practice is acceptable. Right Wing Christians have posted lists of their own, which have made it easier for, say, Right Wing anti-choice activists to hunt down and murder doctors who give women abortions. The McCarthy-era blacklists destroyed people's lives. Some militant animal rights groups have used lists to target those who imprison and torture animals in labs for sidewalk demonstrations and harassment in front of these people's homes. None of these seem like good ideas to me. None of these strategies are respectful of people's space, privacy, and families. Some of these strategies are outright violent. Are the lists in California any better? Well, yes. They don't include home addresses and phone numbers, so far as I've seen. It seems their primary purpose is to facilitate boycotts, and to help people know where they can send letters. This is public accountability. This is putting faces on the oppressors. This isn't a call for violence, and this will not destroy people's lives. It might, however, mean they get less business and more mail from people they're oppressing. If that's uncomfortable for them that's too bad - they, after all, pulled together millions of dollars to oppress queer families, which I think is a little more egregious than encouraging letter-writing and economic boycotts. If they really had courage in their convictions, they'd welcome these lists put on the internet by gay people - after all, if they're on the moral high ground, why do they want to hide their faces?
Another article in the New York Times quotes Alan C. Ashton, the grandson of a former president of the Mormon Church, who donated one million dollars in support of the oppression of families like mine. He calls our protests (including, presumably, the vast majority of our protests, which are peaceful and not marred by bigotry) "off-putting." He says, “I think that shows colors... by their fruit, ye shall know them.” Mormons and other religious groups have been showing their colors for generations. What is the fruit of homophobia? Queer teens are committing suicide. Transgender people are being raped and murdered. People born intersexed are being surgically altered and given drugs that change who they are without consent, in their infancy and childhood. Queer folks are shouted at and hurt in the streets. So many queer people are so crippled by internalized homophobia, or so wounded by the homophobia of their families and communities, that they can never self-actualize and be honest about who they are. Ashton and his millionaire friends might try to paint themselves as the victims now that we queer folks are finally lifting ourselves out of the ashes of history, but I'm guessing they're more afraid of us gaining full personhood than they are of our "enemies lists" and boycotts.
UPDATE, 11.18.08
Editorial: Vandalism, coercion are counterproductive to fight for gay marriage mentions the vandalism of Mormon churches and says of other incidents, "One ugly case was the boisterous protest by dozens of gay marriage supporters outside a small Los Angeles restaurant where the owner's daughter had contributed $100 to Proposition 8. The loss of customers threatened the livelihoods of employees, some of whom were gay and opposed the initiative." This is such a shame. It might not be home harassment but it's still harassment, and I don't think it will make this restaurant owner's daughter any more sympathetic to the idea of gay marriage. We can't bully people into seeing us as their equals.
By Ari | Nov 11, 08 04:30 PM
I just read a piece on the Huffington Post, Shaun Jacob Halper's Why Some Americans Don't Have Reason to Celebrate, and found it interesting from an animal rights perspective. It reads in part:
This past Election Tuesday, Californians turned out in droves to recognize the rights of caged-chickens while denying the rights of gays and lesbians to marry. Passing Prop 2 and Prop 8, Californians secured a chicken's right to "extend its wings, lie down, stand up, and turn around" in confinement, while revoking basic democratic rights from gays; rights like equal protection under the law, the ability to pursue happiness, and the freedom to worship religion without state interference (that's right, there are Judeo-Christian confessions that view same-sex marriage as sacred). In short, Californians sympathize with chickens but not with gays.
Isn't he minimizing the plight of chickens, and saying one oppression is worse (more worthy of concern) than another? I agree it's tragically sad that so many Californian voters have made such an unjust and oppressive choice. But why compare it to their vote to treat innocent chickens with just a little more compassion, as if that decision is somehow silly or less important?
I too am queer, and I too want my partnership, my family, to be legally recognized and not discriminated against. But though I'm oppressed as a queer woman, I've got all kinds of privilege that make my life about a million times better and more free than that of almost any animal of almost any other species. The way that we treat domesticated animals like chickens is absolutely unconscionable - we literally bring them into the world in huge numbers, expressly to suffer and die for our benefit. That voters have made a tiny step toward treating living, feeling animals with just a little more kindness is a beautiful thing. I don't begrudge my feathered sisters their political win. Maybe the folks who care so much about chickens will one day open their hearts a little wider and extend some kindness to queer folks as well. Denigrating their love of animals will not help them to open their hearts.
Maybe Halper is on his way to this realization already, though he's yet to see the connection between the oppression of non-human animals and the oppression of human animals. He writes,
It is the gay community who has failed to build coalitions with other groups. Wake-up call to gay leadership: We must form institutional alliances with other minority communities and start supporting each others interests. We are not going to see these groups support our right to marry if we do not make an active effort to support them as well.
We need to start seeing allies everywhere, and treating everyone as our brothers and sisters in a universal struggle for peace and justice. Maybe some of those we treat with respect and love don't have the power or capability to give us anything in return - but it's not about reciprocity, it's about doing the right thing by our neighbors. A win for the chickens is a win for us all.
By Shira | Nov 10, 08 12:47 PM

I think it's really great that the Obamas are considering adopting a shelter dog. However, it seems unjust to me that Malia's allergies might sway the family to go for a "pure" breed. Since when does one person's allergy justify another's oppression? Perhaps it's time to consider adopting a different species altogether. The question is are Americans ready for a ferret in the White House?
By Ari | Nov 6, 08 08:06 AM
My good friend Josh has written a beautiful, positive call to action for equality in California. Read it, and get excited!
Hey folks,Damn I'm jazzed!
5 Great Things YOU can do about Prop 8!
1) Start feeling good!
The vote on 8 won't be certified until next month. Start visualizing and Secret'ing it to lose! The trick is to visualize it to the point where you feel REALLY good, like it's REALLY happening!
Also, remind yourself that while if Prop 8 does pass, it will be but a momentary setback in the civil rights movement... while at the same time, we are celebrating the groundbreaking civil rights victory of having for the first time a black President! Civil rights moves forward inexorably. We will prevail!
(If you don't understand how people of color and queers have more in common than less, talk to me.)
2) Feel REALLY good!
Novel lawsuits are already being filed, on the grounds that Prop 8 misused the amendment process to undermine the constitution itself. Other lawsuits are also being filed. It might be even MORE FUN if Prop 8 wins and then gets struck down in the courts! Hah! So if that feels even better to you, Secret that!
3) Fight FOR your equality, not AGAINST Prop 8, conservatives, or anything else... not even in your mind.
What you resist, persists. Fight FOR your equality, your right to be treated equal under the law, and your acceptance in our culture for who you are.
4) Shift to not fighting at all.
Resist the urge to see this as a war, an us versus them dynamic with winners and losers.
This is what many conservatives actually want. If your head is making war, then you are actually participating in the global war machine they support.
If you want peace on this planet, do not expect it until you can figure out how to assert your equality in peace.
Take action, certainly... but do it in a way that does not divide you from others. Stay connected to your friends and family members that are so wrapped up in their own fears that they could vote Yes on 8. Be an agent of change in their lives.
Create this change through love and unity, not war and separation.
5) Know what Prop 8 is really about and respond to that.
Realize that this is not really about marriage at all, but about keeping queers invisible, discriminated against, oppressed. So, be visible... be yourself, fearlessly, powerfully, and encourage others to do the same.
Examine your experiences to see if there are any ways, even little ways, that you still hide who you really are AND/OR allow others to express their homophobia without letting them know how their actions affect you.
Do you refrain from talking about your relationships at work even though straight coworkers do? When was the last time you let a homophobic joke go without saying something? Are you still hiding from any of your family members to some degree? Can you meet new people, spend any significant amount of time with them, and make it so they leave without really knowing you're gay/queer/trans/etc?
Even if you're "fully out", do you modulate it down sometimes? Under what circumstances? Are you living as queer as you actually are? If you're heterosexual, are YOU living as queer as you actually are?
Remember, if someone has to be uncomfortable or unhappy, it doesn't have to be you. :-)
BONUS! 6) Forward this message on!
Please feel free to mail, email, or repost this text. All I ask is that you include the original link: http://bunnykitteh.livejournal.com/155593.html
}{ugs,
JoshPs. In my rush to excite and empower you, I forgot one little thing... you may not be ready yet! (Thanks Ben, for reminding me!)
If you are feeling angry, sad, hurt... going through the stages of grief... or whatever process you're in, stick with it! Those feelings are sooo important. They are messages that your needs are not getting met.
It was through my own process of getting deeply in touch with the pain of being seen as less-than-a-person by people I grew up with, really getting what that means, that I was able to take back my power and choose my response.
Know that you are loved and surrounded by good wishes for your well being as you go through whatever you are going through right now.
By Shira | Nov 5, 08 10:14 AM

By Shira | Nov 4, 08 03:49 PM

I've been crying tears of joy off and on for weeks now, just thinking about today and Obama being president. I just got back from voting and I'm feeling patriotic.
I can't say that I've ever had a lot of American pride. In fact, in the past eight years, I've often wondered why my immigrant parents didn't choose a more socialist European country to settle in, and yes, I seriously considered moving to Canada for gay marriage and healthcare.
It hasn't helped that I turned eighteen in '98 and the only presidential elections I've had the right to participate in were mired in fraud and disenfranchisement. From the looks of it, the electoral system is still broken. Did you hear that Tim Robbins wasn't on the rolls today? But despite the broken machines and long lines, something big is happening. Something "historical" is happening. Something is changing.
Sure, Obama's hands will be tied on a lot of issues. And he's definitely more conservative than me in many respects. But I don't have any illusions that nation-states will dissolve, and people will work cooperatively for peace across the globe anytime soon. Pragmatic change is still change and I am ready to embrace it.
The day's not over yet, so who knows what will happen for sure. The difference is that this time, if there is a conspiracy to steal the vote, we're not going to take it, and neither is Obama.
By Ari | Nov 3, 08 10:40 PM
![]()
From Tears for Obama, a very touching slideshow of photos on Huffington Post, showing people crying at Obama rallies.
See also: O-Bama Faces, The Obamas' Greatest PDA Moments, Campaign Trail PDA: The Obama/Biden Edition, The Obamas' Greatest Family Moments, and the rest of the slideshows. They're all pretty heart-warmingly fantastic.