By Shira | Jul 15, 08 01:14 PM
Ari and I went to check out the Click! show at the Brooklyn Museum. Seeing my name and photo on the gallery wall was a little anti-climactic, but thrilling nonetheless. While the methodology behind the project is very interesting, the gallery execution felt a little flat. It would have been awesome, for example, to see the results animated on flat-screen TVs, alongside snippets about crowd-sourcing, curation and the nature of photography.
The show is getting some press coverage...
From Proles vs. Pros: An Experiment In Curating by Robin Givhan:
This exhibit may have been particularly suited to crowd-based curating because photography is a medium that people experience every day, whether it is a particularly artful photo in the newspaper or an artsy black-and-white snapshot of their newborn they're e-mailing to relatives. There's a sense of ownership and accessibility with photography that doesn't exist with sculpture or painting. That connection is one of its pleasures; it doesn't seem so precious or elitist.
And 3,344 People May Not Know Art but Know What They Like By Ken Johnson:
How people arrive at consensus in the art world is worth studying. So is the tension between experts and nonexperts, which can extend to the highest reaches of the culture industry. So it is possible that Mr. Surowiecki’s ideas might yet prove fruitful for the business of art. But it will take a lot more persuasive reasoning to convince anyone with a serious interest in artistic quality that “crowd-curating” is a good idea. The best you can say for “Click!” is that it’s a good conversation starter.
Here's a podcastof the panel at Governor's Island. I ask a question at about 44min. 30 sec.:
And there's a book of the show available through Blurb:
Buy the book!
$3 off discount code
Previous item: Reverend Billy: Americans Stop Shopping
Next item: Resistance is Fertile: It's Time to Start Guerrilla Gardening »